white prunus

hab's nochmal nachbearbeitet und den rechten oberen quadranten noch etwas unschärfer gemacht...

Sehr schön geworden!
Bei mir setzen bei all den Frühlingsbildern allmählich die Frühlingsgefühle ein. ;-)

danke. das freut mich. :-)

Just beautiful, limone, but the technical resolution of pictures for the group " # Frontpage Photography # " should be at least 1600 x 900 pixels. So please let's wait and see, what Bernhard thinks.

thank you, but, um, the resolution is actually 1600x900 pixels? (this image has the same resolution all my other submitted images have?) I haven't upscaled it either.

here ist the link to the full resolution image:

www.ipernity.com/remote/download.php/200/16/00/46321600.a43e029c.jpg?download=white%20prunus.jpg

Indeed, limone, please see here: www.ipernity.com/group/2341904/discuss/189078.

So far, images should have at least 1200x665 pixels, but the requirements have recently been adapted to the given circumstances, and there may be occasional changes/adjustments to the specifications in the group rules. Therefore, please update yourself every now and then.

Bernhard will certainly download the full resolution when it is actually needed. Therefore, I leave the picture in the preselection.

Thank you for your effort.

Thank you but I still don't get it, the resolution of my image is already high enough with 1600*900? All my images submitted have 1600*900 which is the current requirement.

My previous comment may have been misunderstanding. The image uploaded does have the required resolution of 1600*900 pixels, all my submissions have this resolution. I have uploaded it as 1600*900. Which resolution do you get displayed for my image?

Das scheint sich eins ums andere mal zu ändern... Habe ich, glaube ich, auch angemerkt, dass die Masse variieren. Die letzten Angaben, die ich beim Anschluss an die Gruppe sah waren 1220 x 675 (nicht 665) und 2440 x 1375. Wäre gut, wenn man sich auf eine Anweisung beschränken könnte. Denn das Bearbeiten kostet die Leute ja auch Zeit.

Is it 1200 x 665 or 1200 x 675? I got the latter instruction... (?)

stimmt schon, aber der witz ist, meine bilder *haben* ja alle schon die aktuell geforderte auflösung von 1600*900 pixel, deshalb verstehe ich gerade das problem nicht... bin etwas ratlos und hoffe, es handelt sich nur um eine verwechslung. ich achte schon von haus aus sehr akribisch auf sowas... ;-)

current requirement is 1600*900 see link provided by ima moderator above... :-)

I get the resolution 1024 (1024 x 576) displayed for your picture. However, "ima:" as part of your contacts may have access to the original size, depending on how you made the settings.

Due to the often required post-processing by "ima:" / Bergfex=Bernhard, the resolution had to be corrected upwards, www.ipernity.com/group/2341904/discuss/189078
The format remains unchanged at 16:9.

ha! that explains it! I just adjusted the settings so that all people can view and download original size and added you to my contacts. I was just confused because you already accepted earlier uploads where the settings where the same. sorry. had totally forgotten about this setting (which should just prevent image theft from strangers). thanks for making it clear.

das rätsel hat sich jetzt auch aufgeklärt, ich hab jetzt auch * ઇઉ * als contact hinzugefügt und zusätzlich alle auflösung für alle freigegeben. :-)

With pleasure, limone! :)

Unlike your previous pictures, I had to check some details a bit closer and found out that the maximum size was 1024.

However, as a club member, in fact, you don't have to allow the download in general, but as mentioned by Pandarine you can do this individually by changing the license of the respective image.

Your picture has been finalised now.
It will be taken into the 2nd set of pictures for the new frontpage,
if you give your OK directly underneath the processed picture, please:
www.ipernity.com/doc/team/46336622

Beautiful springtime flower; great use of bokeh.