8:14 AM
Behold
Afternoon light
Realism
Erosion
Urban reflections
Fully empty
Beware cameras
Going down
Early virtual reality
Detachable heart
Erosion
Man who changed a light bulb
Point of view
Atlas
Unspoken
Church on the hill...
Invocation
Leprechaun
Bumblebee
Step outside!
In the ideal world...
Excavator
Mr Nobody making a statement
Comb
Bicycles
Kalma
Learning to fly
Bullet holes
Blue boundary
Imaginary Malevich's red squares: Rusted
Hanger
Behind the camera
Ceasefire
Space Oddity
Original idea
Dreaming trees
Fresh snow
Mirage
Unboxing Christmas 2016
...22, 23, 24 LIFT OFF!
Sad news
Hockey fan
VIP
Breaking the silence
See also...
Keywords
Authorizations, license
-
Visible by: Everyone -
All rights reserved
-
501 visits
What is Art?
Notice: This story is mostly fictional, and no art was damaged while illustrating it ;-)
Decorative art
When I was a child, I thought art is something one is not supposed to taste, touch, interact with, play with, use, or break. It is only something to look, and most often look it as something hanging up on the wall, or item placed on some rather high platform. And even if art was a decoration on some useful item, it still was something to be handled with great care.
Representative art
When I grew older, I sort of got that art is often representative, supposed to make something or someone look as an icon. And again art was something one should look up to. Art looked like it is used only as a status-symbol.
Illustrative art
When I learned to read (all forms of texts), I understood art can also illustrate stories. Or the other way round, I understood the images in books, movies, music and theater plays are also art. That was the first time I understood art can be somehow useful and entertaining.
Modern art
As a teenager, I began to comprehend art as something I can also do with my own hands, to express my own feelings. I learned there are various isms to copycat in order to mimic those feelings.
Ideological art
During the years in university I poisoned my mind with the idea of using art for making statements. Well, that is of course a noble goal what many belief as being the ultimate goal of art, to change the world into a better place.
Graffiti art
When trying to find my place in society, I started to think art is indeed supposed to be used to get some status and acknowledgement. Being an author and become a respected copyright owner seemed just as important as pissing onto corners in order to draw the lines of my own territory.
Art as (f)art
A short period of time inspired by Malevich and Pollock, when art suddenly started to look as something that can have a life of it's own, free from authors, owners, representations, time and space...
Contemporary art
When I finally saw myself as a grown-up, I learned to see art as a process. It is the path, a trip, a road, experience and experiment, voyage, a moment in time, meditation, way of life, and what is most important, it is interactive and useful. Art is everywhere, and in it's best forms it is an example of an extreme beauty, usability and design, and definitely supposed to be touched, felt, smelled, heard, played with, and even tasted. In other words, experienced in every possible way.
Unfortunately photography does not give much possibilities for physical interaction, unless you print it on a cake. However, photographs can be used for play, to challenge each other to take shots on certain themes, to guess what's in the picture, or to play domino.
Decorative art
When I was a child, I thought art is something one is not supposed to taste, touch, interact with, play with, use, or break. It is only something to look, and most often look it as something hanging up on the wall, or item placed on some rather high platform. And even if art was a decoration on some useful item, it still was something to be handled with great care.
Representative art
When I grew older, I sort of got that art is often representative, supposed to make something or someone look as an icon. And again art was something one should look up to. Art looked like it is used only as a status-symbol.
Illustrative art
When I learned to read (all forms of texts), I understood art can also illustrate stories. Or the other way round, I understood the images in books, movies, music and theater plays are also art. That was the first time I understood art can be somehow useful and entertaining.
Modern art
As a teenager, I began to comprehend art as something I can also do with my own hands, to express my own feelings. I learned there are various isms to copycat in order to mimic those feelings.
Ideological art
During the years in university I poisoned my mind with the idea of using art for making statements. Well, that is of course a noble goal what many belief as being the ultimate goal of art, to change the world into a better place.
Graffiti art
When trying to find my place in society, I started to think art is indeed supposed to be used to get some status and acknowledgement. Being an author and become a respected copyright owner seemed just as important as pissing onto corners in order to draw the lines of my own territory.
Art as (f)art
A short period of time inspired by Malevich and Pollock, when art suddenly started to look as something that can have a life of it's own, free from authors, owners, representations, time and space...
Contemporary art
When I finally saw myself as a grown-up, I learned to see art as a process. It is the path, a trip, a road, experience and experiment, voyage, a moment in time, meditation, way of life, and what is most important, it is interactive and useful. Art is everywhere, and in it's best forms it is an example of an extreme beauty, usability and design, and definitely supposed to be touched, felt, smelled, heard, played with, and even tasted. In other words, experienced in every possible way.
Unfortunately photography does not give much possibilities for physical interaction, unless you print it on a cake. However, photographs can be used for play, to challenge each other to take shots on certain themes, to guess what's in the picture, or to play domino.
Diane Putnam, John FitzGerald, Au Cœur... diagonalhorizon, Sylvain Wiart and 21 other people have particularly liked this photo
- Keyboard shortcuts:
Jump to top
RSS feed- Latest comments - Subscribe to the comment feeds of this photo
- ipernity © 2007-2024
- Help & Contact
|
Club news
|
About ipernity
|
History |
ipernity Club & Prices |
Guide of good conduct
Donate | Group guidelines | Privacy policy | Terms of use | Statutes | In memoria -
Facebook
Twitter
And fine reverse side of art.
Fine explanation.
art is in the eye and the heart of the beholder
Reminds me of some art I saw once. There were white parcels all wrapped in plaster of Paris. If you then wanted to open the parcel to see what was inside the piece of art would be destroyed.
Sami Serola (inactiv… club has replied to autofantasia clubSami, I like your clarity when explaining yourself. I don't have it!
Sami Serola (inactiv… club has replied to Diane Putnam clubEspecially when any image (also photograph) is made to look very abstract, it no longer represents. It turns into object where the "function" surpasses the representative nature of the image.
Well, I guess I'm now failing on my explanation... =D But the point is this. We all of course can't see any image without bringing in all our previous experiences and interpretations. However, we can also try to bring in our imagination. And a good image, no matter how it is done, can provoke our imagination run freely =)
Diane Putnam club has replied to Sami Serola (inactiv… clubwww.ipernity.com/doc/1227338/44187494
www.ipernity.com/doc/1227338/44166202
www.ipernity.com/doc/1227338/43975690
Sign-in to write a comment.