Another Foothill Pond
Santa Rosa Creek
Forest Edge
West Sonoma
Sunlit Oak
Foothill Oak
First Light
Santa Rosa Creek
Sunrise Oaks
Beach Cliff Flowers
Mixed Cliff Flowers
Crane Creek Solargraph
Emigrant Gap
Mystery
Lake Pend Oreille 1
Lake Pend Oreille 2
Lake Pend Oreille 3
Mount Shasta
Carmet
Santa Rosa Creek
Wet Mango
Sebastopol Farm
Long Ago...
Foothill Pond
Twilight Willow
Canfield Hills
Roblar Hills
Petaluma Hills
A path between oaks
Duncans Cove
Laguna Lake (crop)
Spring Hill Mustard
Woodbridge Road
Pond "A"
Spring Lake
Crane Creek Pinhole
Spring Hill Sky
Round Valley Oaks
Pastoral
Fish Pond
End of the Beach
Deep Shade
Laguna Lake Sunset
Old Farm House
Pinhole Sand Dollar
Location
Lat, Lng:
Lat, Lng:
You can copy the above to your favourite mapping app.
Address: unknown
Lat, Lng:
You can copy the above to your favourite mapping app.
Address: unknown
Keywords
Authorizations, license
-
Visible by: Everyone -
All rights reserved
-
631 visits
Llano de Santa Rosa
I have been experimenting with making "faux POP" paper by soaking normal photo paper in KNO3. This was printed out, not developed. The paper negative is from last summer and is 116-size ( 2-1/2 x 4-1/4 in. ) Printed 2 June 2013.
The actual print is very flat and the colors are not this dark. These colors and details are visible, but muted. After I scanned it, I went to adjust the levels, and happened to try "auto". The software increased the contrast very much and this was the result. I like it so I decided to upload it, but it is not an accurate representation of the print :-). This must be considered a hybrid analog/digital process.
To my eyes: the color tone in clouds is about right. The trees are more pink/reddish and the grass foreground is a little more yellow on the print. The sky has more white and less blue in the print. There is far less contrast in the print.
Details:
Original negative: pre-flashed Ilford MGIV, Kodak No. 1A Autographic Jr., w/ yellow filter.
This print: Arista.edu RCVC pearl, soaked in ~5% KNO3 for 20 minutes.
Wet contact printed out under BLB fluorescent tube for 1 hour.
Washed in water with a pinch of NaCl.
Fixed in weak hypo ( ~5%) for 10 minutes.
Washed.
Toned, KRST 1:500 for 20 minutes.
Washed again.
The actual print is very flat and the colors are not this dark. These colors and details are visible, but muted. After I scanned it, I went to adjust the levels, and happened to try "auto". The software increased the contrast very much and this was the result. I like it so I decided to upload it, but it is not an accurate representation of the print :-). This must be considered a hybrid analog/digital process.
To my eyes: the color tone in clouds is about right. The trees are more pink/reddish and the grass foreground is a little more yellow on the print. The sky has more white and less blue in the print. There is far less contrast in the print.
Details:
Original negative: pre-flashed Ilford MGIV, Kodak No. 1A Autographic Jr., w/ yellow filter.
This print: Arista.edu RCVC pearl, soaked in ~5% KNO3 for 20 minutes.
Wet contact printed out under BLB fluorescent tube for 1 hour.
Washed in water with a pinch of NaCl.
Fixed in weak hypo ( ~5%) for 10 minutes.
Washed.
Toned, KRST 1:500 for 20 minutes.
Washed again.
, , , and 4 other people have particularly liked this photo
- Keyboard shortcuts:
Jump to top
RSS feed- Latest comments - Subscribe to the comment feeds of this photo
- ipernity © 2007-2024
- Help & Contact
|
Club news
|
About ipernity
|
History |
ipernity Club & Prices |
Guide of good conduct
Donate | Group guidelines | Privacy policy | Terms of use | Statutes | In memoria -
Facebook
Twitter
@ Reinhard, thanks! Something different to experiment with!
Ned club has replied to Graham HughesSign-in to write a comment.