Chocolate Buns
A Billingham Bag
Peel Here
Oil, 1999
Rags
Devizes Wharf, 6.30pm
The Desperately Dirty Lens
Canon EF 35-135mm f/4-5.6 USM
Premises
Clowns
Market Traders
Headland
Harbour
Weymouth
Riverside Pub
Windows
Fabric Pattern
Voilà!
Old Newspapers
The Marlans 'Domke' Camera Bag
Sun
Bee
Astrolabe, Avebury Manor, Avebury
The New Baby
Konica
The Concise Oxford Dictionary
Helios-44
Puffin
Brief Encounter
The 35mm Photographer's Handbook
Photography: Depth-of-Field
Each Year is Different
Feel the Power
Lemn in Tumblr
Dinosaurs
Helios-44
Outer Space
Small Ads
Diary
Chinon 55mm f/1.4
Canon
Toast
Palm Cross
Raindrops
Chinon 55mm Lenses
See also...
Keywords
Authorizations, license
-
Visible by: Everyone -
All rights reserved
-
315 visits
A Fast Standard Lens
This photograph shows a Canon EOS 40D camera fitted via an adapter with a Tomioka-manufactured, Chinon badged, 55mm f/1.4 lens made around 1975 to a Planar design by Johannes Berger.
The photograph was taken with a Nikon D700 fitted with a Nikkor 50mm f/1.4 AF-D lens. That camera-lens combination is very capable and unquestionably superior to the kit in the picture, yet the old Chinon lens is nevertheless a pleasure to use, if a bit challenging to focus sometimes. Because the Canon EOS 40D is a crop-sensor camera, the field-of-view is 55mm x 1.6, that is equivalent to 88mm, and thus more of a short telephoto.
These old lenses, with little or no coating, and no computer technology involved in their design, seem to imbue your photographs with particular colour characteristics which are a bit different to modern day lenses. On researching this particular lens, I was glad to discover it is generally well-regarded. One reviewer was especially enthusiastic:
The following are highlights from a review of this lens at erphotoreview.com/wordpress/?p=1264
'The lens has very strong center performance wide open for an f/1.4 lens, especially considering its age. Contrast drops off quickly towards the corners, but the lens still has decent resolution. Even at f/2 the resolution is exceptional in the center, and the corners are very good resolution by f/2.8...Flare resistance is terrible...Distortion is a fairly minor barrel distortion. Fairly easy to correct, and likely not an issue for most situations. This lens really surprised me. I was expecting junk and it ended up being the biggest surprise of the lenses I tested. In terms of sharpness, the only place this lens is lacking is wide open at the corners, otherwise it is comparable to the best of the best.'
To the reviewer's remarks I would add that 'sharpness' is a general term to describe the clarity of detail in a photograph. Fundamentally, only two factors contribute to the perceived sharpness of an image: resolution and acutance, the latter being the contrast. Resolution relates to closely-spaced details in a picture, whereas acutance is a question of whether edges are well-defined or blurred. When we apply 'sharpening' to a photograph in post-production, it is only the acutance which is altered; the resolution is determined at the instant the photograph is taken.
The photograph was taken with a Nikon D700 fitted with a Nikkor 50mm f/1.4 AF-D lens. That camera-lens combination is very capable and unquestionably superior to the kit in the picture, yet the old Chinon lens is nevertheless a pleasure to use, if a bit challenging to focus sometimes. Because the Canon EOS 40D is a crop-sensor camera, the field-of-view is 55mm x 1.6, that is equivalent to 88mm, and thus more of a short telephoto.
These old lenses, with little or no coating, and no computer technology involved in their design, seem to imbue your photographs with particular colour characteristics which are a bit different to modern day lenses. On researching this particular lens, I was glad to discover it is generally well-regarded. One reviewer was especially enthusiastic:
The following are highlights from a review of this lens at erphotoreview.com/wordpress/?p=1264
'The lens has very strong center performance wide open for an f/1.4 lens, especially considering its age. Contrast drops off quickly towards the corners, but the lens still has decent resolution. Even at f/2 the resolution is exceptional in the center, and the corners are very good resolution by f/2.8...Flare resistance is terrible...Distortion is a fairly minor barrel distortion. Fairly easy to correct, and likely not an issue for most situations. This lens really surprised me. I was expecting junk and it ended up being the biggest surprise of the lenses I tested. In terms of sharpness, the only place this lens is lacking is wide open at the corners, otherwise it is comparable to the best of the best.'
To the reviewer's remarks I would add that 'sharpness' is a general term to describe the clarity of detail in a photograph. Fundamentally, only two factors contribute to the perceived sharpness of an image: resolution and acutance, the latter being the contrast. Resolution relates to closely-spaced details in a picture, whereas acutance is a question of whether edges are well-defined or blurred. When we apply 'sharpening' to a photograph in post-production, it is only the acutance which is altered; the resolution is determined at the instant the photograph is taken.
- Keyboard shortcuts:
Jump to top
RSS feed- Latest comments - Subscribe to the comment feeds of this photo
- ipernity © 2007-2024
- Help & Contact
|
Club news
|
About ipernity
|
History |
ipernity Club & Prices |
Guide of good conduct
Donate | Group guidelines | Privacy policy | Terms of use | Statutes | In memoria -
Facebook
Twitter
Sign-in to write a comment.