Dinesh

Dinesh club

Posted: 25 Apr 2022


Taken: 25 Apr 2022

0 favorites     4 comments    40 visits


Keywords

The Consciousness Instinct
Excerpt
Author
Michael Gazzaniga
Second Excerpt
The Bhodisattava's Brain
Owen Flanagan


Authorizations, license

Visible by: Everyone
All rights reserved

40 visits


Hume

Hume

Comments
 Dinesh
Dinesh club
Hume soon realized that some fallacies that were rampant in the ancient world -- such as relying on hypotheses based on speculation and invention, rather than rexperience and observation -- were also to be found among his contemporaries. Hume believed that our knowledge of reality is based on our experience, and for better or worse, on the axioms we choose. Adioms are statements that seem so evident or well-established that they are acepted without controversy or question and are simply asserted without proof. To put it simply, an axiom is a fundamentally un-provable assumption or an opinion. The problem with bashing knowledge on an axiom is that then what one concludes about realith is dependent on the axioms one chooses. As Duke physicist Robert Brown warns, “There is nothing more dangerous or powerful in the philosophical process than selecting one’s axioms. . . There is nothing more useless than engaging in philosophical, religious, or social debate with another person whose axioms differ significantly from one’s own” ~ Page 38

THE CONSCIOUSNESS INSTINCT
2 years ago. Edited 2 years ago.
 Dinesh
Dinesh club
Naturalism comes in many varieties, but the entry-level union card -- David Hume is our hero -- expresses solidarity with this motto: “Just say no to the supernatural.” Rebirths, hevens, hells, creator gods, teams of gods, village demons, miracles, divine retributions in the form of plagues, earthquakes, tsunamis are things naturalists don’t believe in. What there is and all there is, natural stuff, and everything that happens has some set of natural causes that produce it -- although we may not be able to figure out what these causes are or were. Why be a naturalist? World historical evidence suggests that naturalism, vague s it is, keeps being vindicated, while the zones “explained’ by the supernatural get smaller everyday. Naturalism is a good bet. ~ Page 2

THE BODHISATTVA'S BRAIN
2 years ago. Edited 2 years ago.
 Dinesh
Dinesh club
I take the notion that everything exists in a mind, or in minds, or that existence as such is mental, to be incredible -- indeed, not to be coherently statable -- and certainly to be counter-intuitive. It is that notion that is the standard misrepresentation of the transcendental idealism. . . . . However, far from being a peculiarity of transcendental idealism, this is something which it has in common with a consistent empiricism. There is a famous passage towards the end of Hume’s exposition of his epistemology in which he writes: ‘The intense view of these manifold contradictions and imperfections in human reason has so wrought upon me, and heated my brain, that I am ready to reject all belief and reasoning, and can look upon no opinion even as more probably or likely than another. Where am I, or what? From what causes do I derive my existence, and to what condition shall I return? Whose favour shall I court, and whose anger must I dread? What beings surround me? And on whom have I any influence, or who have any influence on me? I am confounded with all these questions, and begin to fancy myself in the most deplorable condition imaginable, environed with the deepest darkness, and utterly deprived of the use of every member and faculty. Most fortunately it happens, that since reason is incapable for dispelling these clouds, Nature herself suffices to that purpose, and cures me of this philosophical melancholy and delirium, either by relaxing this bend of mind, or by some avocation, and lively impression of my senses, which obliterate all these chimeras. I dine, I play a game, or backgammon, I converse, and am merry with my friends; and when, after three or four hours amusement, I would return to these speculations, they appear so cold, and strained, and ridiculous, that I cannot find in my heart to enter into them any further.. . . . Page 77 - “The Philosophy of Schopenhauer “ ~ author: Bryan Magee

THE PHILOSOPHY OF SCHOPENHAUER
21 months ago. Edited 21 months ago.

Sign-in to write a comment.