Introspection
Earthworms, Charles Darwin & Secular enchantment
Morning sunlight
Mantle
The Essential Haiku
An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, by John L…
A Flower
Visual slippage
Dehaene and Changeux, 1998
Balance
Local festival
Thank you guys
Cold, Widy, rainy...snow flurries...
My November Guest
A Fall day
Winter trees
Central Park
Fall leaves
Arrival on the West Coast
Arrival on the West Coast
Arrival on the West Coast
Window Tree
Fallen leaf
In the evening before the frost
Fall Serenity
Koyaanisqatsi
Koyaanisqatsi
Shirt on your back and coffee in your cup
Keywords
Authorizations, license
-
Visible by: Everyone -
All rights reserved
- Photo replaced on 04 Nov 2014
-
144 visits
Figure 3 ~ Now you see it, now you dont
A visual illusion called "Troxier fading" illustrates one of the many ways in which the subjective content of consciousness can be manipulated. Stare intently at the central cross. after a few seconds, some of the gray dots should vanish, then return at random moments. the objective stimulus is constant, but its subjective inetrpretation keeps changing. something must be changing inside your brain -- can we track it?
- Keyboard shortcuts:
Jump to top
RSS feed- Latest comments - Subscribe to the comment feeds of this photo
- ipernity © 2007-2024
- Help & Contact
|
Club news
|
About ipernity
|
History |
ipernity Club & Prices |
Guide of good conduct
Donate | Group guidelines | Privacy policy | Terms of use | Statutes | In memoria -
Facebook
Twitter
An objectively fixed visual display can pop in and out of our subjective awareness, more or less at random. This profound observation forms the basis of the modern science of consciousness. In the 1990s, the late Nobel Prize winner Francis Crick and the neurobiologist Christof Koch jointly realized that such visual illusions gave scientists a means to track the fate of conscious versus unconscious stimuli in the brain.
Conceptually at least, this research program poses no major difficulty. During the experiment with the twelve dots, for instance, we can record the discharges of neurons from different places in the brain during moments in which the dots are seen, and compare these recordings with those made during moments in which the dots are not seen. Crick and Koch singled out vision as a domain ripe for such investigations, not only because we are beginning to understand the great detail the neural pathways that carry visual information from the retina to the cortex, but also because there are myriad visual illusions that can be used to contrast vision and invisible stimuli. Do they share anything. Is there a single pattern of brain activity that underlies all the conscious states and that provides a unifying ‘signature’ of conscious access in the brain? Finding such a signature pattern would be a major step forward for consciousness research.
In their down-to-earth manner, Crick and Koch had cracked the problem open. Following their lead, dozens of laboratories started studying consciousness through elementary visual illusions such as the one you just experienced. Three features of this research program suddenly put conscious perception with in experimental reach. First, the illusions did not require an elaborate notion of consciousness --just the simple act of seeing or not seeing, what I have called conscious access. second, a great many illusions were available for study -- as we shall see, cognitive scientists have invented dozens of techniques to make words, pictures, sounds, and even gorillas disappear at will. And third, such illusions are eminently subjective -- only you can tell when and where the dots disappear in your mind. Yet the results are reproducible: anyone who watches the figure reports having the same kind of experience. There is no point in denying it: we all agree that something real, peculiar, and fascinating is going on in our awareness. We have to take it seriously. ~ Page 18/19
Sign-in to write a comment.