Dinesh

Dinesh club

Posted: 14 Jun 2013


Taken: 08 Aug 2005

0 favorites     1 comment    334 visits

See also...


Keywords

Justice
Michael Sandel
DONE
COPIED


Authorizations, license

Visible by: Everyone
All rights reserved

334 visits


Squeegee Men

Squeegee Men

Comments
 Dinesh
Dinesh club
The kind of case I have in mind once confronted David Hume, the eighteenth-century Scottish moral philosopher. When he was young, Hume wrote a scathing critique of Locke’s idea of social contract. He called it a “philosophical fiction which never had and never could have any reality,” and “one of the most mysterious and incomprehensible operation that can possibly be imagined.” Years later, Hume had an experience that put to the test his rejection of consent as the basis of obligation.

Hume owned a house in Edinburgh. He rented it to his friend James Boswell, who in turn sublet it to a subtenant. The subtenant decided that the house needed some repairs. He hired a contractor to do the work, without consulting Hume. The contractor made the repairs and sent the bill to Hume. Hume refused to pay on the grounds that he hadn’t consented. He hadn’t hired the contractor. The case went to court. The contractor acknowledged that Hume hadn’t consented. But the house needed the repairs, and he performed them.

Hume thought this a bad argument. The contractor’s claim was simply “that the work was necessary to be done,” Hume told the court. But this is “no good answer, because by the same rule he may go through every house in Edinburgh, and do what he thinks proper to be done, without the landlord’s consent…and give the same reason for what he did, that the work was necessary and the house was the better of it.” But this, Hume maintained, was “a doctrine quite new and…altogether untenable.”

When it came to his house repairs, Hume didn’t like a purely benefit based theory of obligation. But his defense failed, and the court ordered him to pay.

The idea that an obligation to repay a benefit can arise without consent is morally plausible in the case of Hume’s house. But it can easily slide into high-pressure sales tactics and other abuses. In the 1980s and early “90s, “squeegee men” became an intimidating presence on New York city streets. Equipped with a squeegee and a bucket of water, they would descend upon a car stopped at red light, wash the window-shield (often without asking the driver’s permission,), and then ask for payment. They operated on the benefit-based theory of obligation invoked by Hume’s contractor. But the absence of cnsent, the line between performing a service and panhandling often blurred. Mayor Rudolph Giuliani decided to crack down on the squeegee men and order the police to arrest them. ~ Page 147
11 years ago.

Sign-in to write a comment.