Dear ipernity-team,
ipernity is a good place.
But I have some questions:
Why is it allowed, that user can show here stolen images ('netfinds')?
Why is it allowed, that user can show here candid shots (where are the personal rights from the people on this pictures)?
And, why close ipernity accounts with artful pictures (primary accounts with nude males)?
Best regards
Knut W.
(excuse my bad english)
Heute mal wieder gespendet. Ärzte ohne Grenzen - Médecins sans Frontières.
-
Heute mal wieder 100€ gespendet, nachdem ich u.a. viele Jahre Ärzte ohne Grenzen auch monatlich unte…
-
16 Aug 2010
Goodbye facebook...
-
:-)
I don't like the behavior of facebook...
-
17 May 2010
See all articles...
With...
Authorizations, license
-
Visible by: Everyone (public). -
All rights reserved
-
3 515 visits
open letter to ipernity
, , Elbertinum, and 2 other people have particularly liked this article
Jump to top
RSS feed- Latest comments - Subscribe to the feed of comments related to this post
- ipernity © 2007-2024
- Help & Contact
|
Club news
|
About ipernity
|
History |
ipernity Club & Prices |
Guide of good conduct
Donate | Group guidelines | Privacy policy | Terms of use | Statutes | In memoria -
Facebook
Twitter
Personally I do not have the problem here with my account, due to lack of "problematic" photos, but I am affected if people I visit are affected. I even think about reactivating my flickr account, is for me no diff if some french robot censr or ami censr are active in a community, especially if they do not have one eye to the quality of pictures they block upon a complaint of someone surfing around in ipernity.
Seems for me too, that those people which might have problems with admins eliminate the admin problem by running their own system. In fact layouts for photo blog systems are often better presenting artistic pictures than here in a "stream" and with those dia flash-boxes without great possibility to layout those flash-boxes. Rests the problem, that you loose the community if you shut down your flickr or ipernity account completely. And it rests the problem, that they were so quite happy to have a refugee for all flickr-pissed-people. They should have been aware that people fleeing from flickr are not those which post always flowers with bumblebees, for christ's sake! In june I have to renew my pro account, dear ipernity staff out there!
Edit: 13 minutes earlier there was the post from ip up there. Again: To do not care about a admin decision what is sexual and what not (which might never be hunky-dory for all participants), we need this filtering system. Fix this and fix it fast, because this is the main problem here.
thanks a lot for your answer!
About "stolen images":
I need only seconds to find stolen images.
For example, a stolen picture of Heidi Klum (photographer: Brett Ratner for the Jordache Jeans campaign) on ipernity.
Another example: You can find this photo from Bruno Bisang
http://dailyplateofcrazy.files.wordpress.com/2009/10/luxuriant-memories-of-sweet-dates-photo-by-bruno-bisang-courtesy-menstyle-dot-fr1.jpg
on ipernity...
And so on...
About "candid shots":
I think, ipernity makes advertising for such groups:
If you click on groups, you can see under "Discover those groups"
sometimes groups like:
"candid girls"
"Voyeurism"
And, what is with porn?
See groups like this:
"(Ehe-) Frauen die sich (draussen) gerne zeigen ..."
So much porn here !!!
And you close the account of Samuel B. ...?
Sorry, but I dont' understand it completely.
Personal rights and original content ist very important.
Art is important.
If you delete porn... ok. And stolen images...
I will be sad, if artists with very artful photos will go away from ipernity.
Best regards and thanks again
Knut
iper ohne kreative köpfe auch in den bereichen des künstlerischen bis provokativen akts wäre eine plattform des maintreams only, kommerziell nutzbar, aber jenseits dessen, was sich iper selbst auf die fahnen geschrieben und als alternative zu flickr und co aufgedrängt hatte.
il faudrait plus de censure et plus de censeurs aussi et puis aussi des contrôleurs et les contrôleurs des contrôleurs et puis il faudrait aussi un comité central qui décide ce qui est de l'art de ce qui est du porno
je trouve ça pitoyable
la liberté est un bien précieux et on devrait y réfléchir à 2 fois avant de réclamer plus de contrôle
Sign-in to write a comment.